Thread:Some1New/@comment-37876807-20190803213443/@comment-36159073-20191014025506

really? i thought it was fun. played it with my siblings lol. doesn't it give a tutorial in the beginning (owo)? i could be wrong

ME TOO

I HATE THE DAD SM LIKE CNA HE JUST NOT OHFDSJKLFMXCN

YEAH JUNGKOOK'S HAIR EOIRJDFLAKSJ

I do miss it long, but in the end it's only his opinion that matters so yeah whatever makes him hapy uwu

i have an interesting opinion on that i guess (bts paving the way). cuz there are people who say they did, yet say they are above the kpop industry and above kpop both which i disagree with.

I do agree that bts paved the way, along with

bts aren't above the kpop industry.
 * psy (oppa gangnam style was the first kpop mv to hit 1b views)
 * girls generation (like the most iconic gg; their song "into the new world" is considered the song of the nation so i mean-)
 * blackpink (about to become the first group to have an mv hit 1b views, first k-act performed at coachella)
 * and twice (they're quickly rising in album sales especially after fancy, armyonces are everywhere lol)

bighit is still an entertainment company, and imo all entertainment (k or otherwise) companies still suck no matter what because they still push their artists, hold them to ridiculous standards, and in the end it all comes down to money for them.

bts also aren't "above kpop".

I think it's kinda dumb that any song in korean is still considered k pop (unless by that they mean korean popular music) because songs like Seattle by Sam Kim and Shoot Me by Day6 aren't really pop. Seattle is acoustic, while Shoot Me is alternative pop rock. Both these songs are under the genre "kpop" though. kinda off topic but bear with me.

like Sam Kim and Day6, bts's songs aren't all under the genre "pop". this is not what i see a lot of people mean by bts being above kpop though.

I've observed stan twt for a while now, and a 90% of the time when someone says "bts are above kpop" they mean that bts are a whole new genre "btspop" whatever the heck that means. they usually say this because of the one time rm said that bts weren't the representatives of kpop. I see people quote this a lot.

Well, ofc, bts aren't the representatives of kpop, the sole representatives, that is. If I were to introduce someone to kpop, I wouldn't just mention bts and say that that's all there is. I'd mention my other ults: Stray Kids, (G)I-DLE, and LOOΠΔ and how they're all very different from each other and what they each have to offer.

'''tl;dr: bts did pave the way along with a few other groups. there is no such thing as "btspop", and bts aren't above the kpop industry.'''

sdfjaeworasd why did i write this i could've done hw uwu