Thread:Charlotte O CATS KOTLC/@comment-37611621-20190408180807/@comment-13278304-20190408210551

MagicDaydreamer wrote: TsunamiTheSeaWing wrote: Charlotte O CATS KOTLC wrote: Tsunami, leave, now, if you're coming in here just to argue. This is us trying to get ourselves together after we've been broken. Stop. Invalidating. People. Right. Now. It's toxic and it hurts people. It hurts and you've been trolling us for too long already. It's like how you ask people who don't believe in homosexuality to stop invalidating you. Now we're asking you to stop invalidating us.

If you're homosexual panromantic, that is STILL LESBIAN. Any type of homesexuality/homoromanticality is STILL LESBIAN. i'm not trolling though? what

i can invalidate the (literally self-contradictory/historically inaccurate/etc.) terms people use without invalidating their sexualities/genders themselves. i'm not attacking anyone as a person, i'm just pointing out that some of the terms being used here are nonsensical.

there's a huge difference between saying "lesbianism historically excludes men entirely" and "being gay is bad lol." idk how you can't see that mate None of us said you were the same as homophobes - we said that you know how it feels to be invalidated, so you shouldn't invalidate others. You don't decide who we are - we do.

I don't want a small thing i say to be argued against every single time. Just please please please. i don't care about invalidation, though. by all means, try to convince me i'm femme instead of butch; that's just an identifier i use, i won't care if you try to argue with me about that. telling me that my sexuality is fundamentally wrong, though, is a whole different matter.