Board Thread:News and Announcements/@comment-98.247.168.42-20181122042639/@comment-39279721-20190525184027

2600:1700:5F20:5310:D135:4DCD:B138:EDA8 wrote: does enyone els think keeper of the lost cities is better than harry potter, i read all of the harry potter books and loved them, but then i read keeper of the lost cities and liked it much better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I actually don't agree. Harry Potter is more developed and inclusive. (by inclusive I am regarding our earlier debate on ethnicity, culture, and lgbtq+ inclusion) HP doesnt just dismiss obvious plotholes and lack of explanation regarding the science v magic topic. (both just can't not exist. however science is regurlarly applied in the elvin world, HUMAN science, might I add, such as in discussing DNA, and even unspoken ideas such as Gravity and more.) KOTLC can be good at times, but the plot is slow and undeveloped, whereas there are many arguments in Harry potters favor. I'm definitely not trying to downgrade KOTLC, but the argument that it is better than a classic with over 500 million copies sold (and made into extrememly popular movies I am compelled to add) is simply ridiculous. It's just uncomparable. But keeper of the lost cities is still a great series.