Talk:Book 1: Keeper of the Lost Cities/@comment-98.247.168.42-20181122033224/@comment-2601:645:8002:13E4:2115:67EA:51C9:A425-20190310165804

I do see where they are coming from, and I admit to agreeing to some of it. Don’t hate me for this, but I don’t get what is so great about Harry Potter. I mean, it was worth reading, but it is honestly on the low end of all the books I have read. Anyway, the review had some ok points about Harry Potter connecting to KotLC, but for one, I don’t think that Dame Alina is Dumbledore, Mr. Forkle is more like him, also Lady Galvin IS NOT SNAPE. Snape plays a nuch more significant role, unlike Lady Galvin, who fades away after pretty much the first book. Also, Luccius Malloy is evil, unlike Lord Cassius. Also, the characters are much more enjoyable in KotLC. The magic-is-not-magic-but-is-science idea can get on my nerves, but it isn’t really brought up that much, so I do not know why they focus on it so much! It’s like they are TRYING to criticize the book. WHY! They should read all the books, cuase it gives a better perspective on the series. And if they criticize the series for not being creative, than TAKE A LOOK AT THE NAMES OF THE HARRY POTTER CHARACTERS. Also, KotLC has a more exciting storyline, plus they keep on adding new things to keep you interested. HURRAY FOR KEEPER OF THE LOST CITIES!!!!!!