Thread:Lowkey done with life/@comment-37869175-20190106215356/@comment-37530514-20190112041212

Okay so PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong, I haven't researched the science behind this very much, it's a bit muddy in my mind- When a female body has a period, or is not creating a child, life has not started. If I made it sound otherwise, seriously, please tell me, but everything I was saying was for after life has begun. Whether or not you consider it to have rights, there is life- it is alive, and abortion is ending that life. What a girl passes in her period is not alive.

What I was saying before is that what is already alive has potential to stay alive, and will continue to stay alive if left untouched. Periods, and not having children when a person could pontentially have children, is different, because they have not already begun a life that will keep going. They are not stopping a living organism from being alive, because that living organism does not exist yet. Sure, you could say they are stopping it from "potentially being alive", but it is not alive yet, so that potential is indefinite. Does that make any sense?

The difference- alive, and will keep living unless it dies of natural causes or is killed by another source, vs not alive, and cannot be killed or let to live.

(...Unless I have something scientifically and fundamentally wrong. If so, PLEASE PLEASE let me know- LOL)