Talk:Sophie and Fitz/@comment-24.115.246.196-20190228043319/@comment-37609893-20190228223142

Is this some sort of joke?

First off, Fitz isn't 2D, he actually is a very deep character. In Flashback, we can see how he has layers. He can get angry, but who doesn't? When people base their arguments off of Fitz's "anger issues" that just makes their argumet worse. You're telling me Keefe or Sophie or anyone else in KotLC hasn't been angry? Also, i'm surprised that Fitz actually didn't get too mad in Exile after he thought his father was going to be gone. Forever. And elves live forever. He would have to live with that forever unless he was killed some other way. And Fitz isn't really a "Golden Boy" anymore. He has actually had some very, very good character development, despite what anyone says. ALSO, even if you argue with me on this, nobody can turn down that this is a fact: Keefe hasn't changed much since the first book. He still teases, (and imo i find it extremly annoying) whilst Fitz has changed so, so much throughout the series. In the first book, he didn't have much of a personallity, but in Flashback, he does. We know Fitz ahas been hurt, angry, happy, sad, and more. He's been through a lot.

And also, when you said that when "Keefe's angry, he doesn’t lash out" that actually isn't good for you to not express your feelings. Holding it in actually damages your brain. though Fitz did get angry with Sophie in Exile, so what? Being angry at someone, like Fitz was, has nothing in comparison to how Keefe literally joined the people who tried to kill Sophie. No matter how much Keefe thought he was helping, he wasn't. Why? Because he's foolish. Absolutely stupid. He doesn't think about his actions, like when he willingly gave a vial of his blood to Fintan. And people argue about how Fitz can get angry sometimes? So dumb.

I realize that kinda turned into more of a counter-Keefe argument towards the end, but I think i've proved my point.