Talk:Sophie and Fitz/@comment-68.231.221.239-20180111023335/@comment-2601:199:0:6948:54A4:F1F8:752D:7EF8-20180111031648

Well, actually having "no" argument as you said is much better than having a faulty one. For instance, the popular Keefoster argument refered to as the "heart vs.head" argument is actually more of a theory than a solid argument. In Nightfall (Barnes Noble special edition) in the bonus section, after Ro comments that Sophie is totally oblivious, the passage states, "It wasn't even the worst part--but he managed to stop himself from bringing up that"(that being in itallics) What else could he be referring to other than her obvious crush on Fitz. As for the other part of the theory, which states that she "only" likes Fitz in the head. Well, to be factual the book never said anything about her liking Keefe in the heart, only about her knowingly likng Fitz. Using that shred of evidence (that she knowingly likes Fitz), they determine that Keefe must be assigned to the other role. Although they don't realize evidence that points the other way. In Everblaze, Bronte mentions that inflicting pulls from the heart. Before healing Fintan, in her inflicting session (the one where she made Bronte laugh) Sophie pulls only on her positive memories and feelings of Fitz. Not Keefe. But Fitz. And I bet if we bothered we could name many more evidence based theories on Sophitz/Fitzphie.

-Although do we really need to "prove our ship"

After all it is as Shannon Messenger puts it "Ultimately Sophie's Descision"