Talk:Fitzroy Avery Vacker/@comment-87.64.58.38-20191226193040/@comment-43957690-20191228200744

So i'm not a big fan of Fitz, but one of the things i agree with you guys on is the Alvar situation. Alvar was a murderer, had tortured twelve year olds, betrayed his family, and done who knows what else. He deserved to go to prsison, and I would not have been appaled if Fitz had killed him. It would have been not only acceptable but responsable, and admirable, because killing a brother because you know that they will only hurt others if they are kept alive is pretty selfless if you ask me. The fact that Fitz wanted justice, yet held back on vengance is something you don't see a lot of in these books.

Alvar was Fitz's brother, and he'd done some horrible, murderous things. Most people would have tried to reveive Alvar, but a villain is a villain. They don't listen to reason. I may not like Fitz, but what he did was mature, and i thought it showed a lot of character development. I agree with the people who relpied on this one (mostly). Do i think Fitz has anger issues? yes. Do i think he's a bloodthirsty revenge monster who WANTED to kill his only brother? no. He had some admirable level-headedness in this situation, and revived himself a little in my eyes.

Fitz was acting for the good of others when he let the cubby fill up with Alvar still inside. I believe that it hurt him to see his brother (seemingly) die.

End rant.