Thread:Lowkey done with life/@comment-37869175-20190106215356/@comment-37869175-20190106230359

Okay, so, think about this:

Is human life more important, or is what a woman wants to do with her body more important?

If it was a choice between the life of the mother and the life of the baby, then maybe yes.

But most of the time, it's not.

It's really a question of: do people have the choice to murder?

Because that baby already has a different set of DNA than anyone else in this world. To answer your question, any baby is an individual from the moment they are conceived. ''They are a completely whole and new person, and they deserve their one basic right. ''

And people say, "it's my body, it should be my choice." But no, it's not your body. It's the baby's body, and you're ending their life before they even have a chance to take their first breath. It shouldn't be your choice to take away someone's life. That baby could become the next amazing president, the person who ends poverty, or a renown artist or the person who finds cure for cancer. And even if they don't become any of those things, they still have worth and dignity, and need to be allowed a chance to live.

Even if the mother conceives the baby at a young age and doesn't feel ready to parent them, there's always giving them up for adoption. It's so, so much better than killing them.

So this is my take on abortion. It just seems so, so wrong to me, and I hope this helped you see things in a new light.