Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-13278304-20190312012536/@comment-13278304-20190313182809

>I just went to the Wings of Fire Wiki and saw a discussion in which you were arguing with someone about their religion and telling them that they were probably hallucinating or it was the placebo affect when they thought they heard God's voice.

Hallucinations are not uncommon. I experience them all the time. I'm almost definitely right on this one.

>And than proceded to say that religion had ruined your life.

It has.

>And told them Catholicism and Christianity were the same thing.

Catholicism falls under Christianity.

>And started an argument by saying that someone's sexuality can't change.

Because it can't. Saying otherwise is conversion therapy rhetoric, and I won't tolerate it.

>And you told someone that they were bisexual.

If you have the capacity to be attracted to both sexes, you are bisexual.

>And used an abbreviation for a bad word.

Okay? That's allowed there.

>And said that humans fit into categories when someone said that they didn't want to be categorized.

But humans DO fit into categories. That's a fact of life.

>And said that people have to be 100% in theire category or else theyre a different category.

In the case of sexuality, this is absolutely the case.

>And verbally attacked people with the view that sexuality can change.

I wasn't attacking anyone personally, just their incorrect and damaging opinions.

>Overall, I feel like the Wings of Fire Wiki isn't the best example for us to follow.

At least we follow the Terms of Use ;3