Thread:Lowkey done with life/@comment-37869175-20190106215356/@comment-37841075-20190107032249

it's fine, I completely understand. Passion is separate from aggression and that's recognizable, don't worry. Also, go for it! I support you doing what you want to since that doesn't harm anyone. :)

I actually spent some time combing through what other people believe on this subject, and there is a particular stance I spotted that fits my infant view. "Pro-balance," as it's called. It's the idea that abortion should be adequately and affordably provided to would-be mothers who have yet to strike a certain mark, usually around the 4 week part, or before the 8 week mark which is when it's capable of feeling pain. I realize it's grim since it's going to grow into a human, but perhaps there's a line that could be drawn. This doesn't mean I'm going to shout that everyone who wants an abortion gets one - the way I see it, the only reason an abortion should be approved and carried out, is if the mother would not be able to survive the pregnancy/childbirth for any number of reasons, not if she simply does not want the child. There it weighs in as the rights of the mother vs the rights of the fetus. Every person has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. So should an unborn child's infringe on the mother's right to live? It feels a bit like an ultimatum in that case?